Market structure  · 

Harnessing Europe’s capital markets to enable a green transition

The EU’s commitment to become climate neutral by 2050 requires massive financing. Capital market infrastructure providers will be key in reorienting capital flows towards sustainable investments. But is the existing capital market structure fit for the green transition?

That was the central theme for leading experts from the European Commission, European Parliament and London Stock Exchange Group who joined a lively online debate hosted by Optiver to discuss how to harness Europe’s capital markets to enable the green transition.

Tatyana Panova, Head of the Capital Markets Union Unit at the European Commission, MEP Caroline Nagtegaal-Van Doorn, David Harris, Head of Sustainable Business at the London Stock Exchange Group, and Optiver CEO Jan Boomaars spoke at the 3 December event. It was moderated by Victor van Hoorn, Executive Director of Eurosif – the European Sustainable Investment Forum.

“We need to listen to the voice of our citizens, and citizens want green,” said Tatyana Panova. “Retail investors are gradually waking up to these products,” she said. “We need to support direct retail participation, so emphasis on disclosure will be very important.”

The LSE’s David Harris also emphasized disclosure. “We need to unleash the power of capital markets to address sustainability issues. A key need is good, relevant data and information investors can use to orient capital. There are significant gaps in that today,” he said. “The market is shifting but could shift faster, better and more efficiently if we have better information flows through the entire system.”

Optiver’s Boomaars called for simplicity and transparency to build investor appetite.

“Let’s keep things simple, try to standardize as much as possible at the beginning, and make ESG products as transparent as we can,” said Boomaars. That will create investor confidence, and all else will follow so that in the long term, ESG products become the standard for the capital markets.”

Optiver advocates these initiatives to improve liquidity and make ESG products meaningful:

  1. Create ESG products that clearly meet investor demand and are successfully marketed so investors are aware of their existence.
  2. Make it attractive for end-investors to trade by minimizing transaction costs.
  3. Incentivize deep liquid order books through attractive market-making schemes, so that ESG products are priced competitively.
  4. Create a standardized framework for companies to report their non-financial ESG information, so investors can compare companies on sustainability.
  5. Create a common method for sustainable ratings agencies (SRAs) to assess companies, replacing the differing proprietary methods used by SRAs now.

 “We urge issuers and exchanges to create more harmonization between ESG products and make differences between ESG products clear to the end-investor, so they can make informed decisions about how to incorporate ESG in their investments.” said Jan Boomaars.

 “What is most important right now is for everyone to take a step in the right direction. To determine the right direction and the path to sustainable finance, we hope that discussions like these – about how to approach it – can help everyone take a step in the right direction.”

Market structure

Related Articles

  • Market structure

    A VIX for APAC: Building a regional volatility benchmark

    Despite the growing popularity of Asia-Pacific markets, investors in the region lack a volatility benchmark on par with the Cboe Volatility Index or the Euro Stoxx 50 Volatility Index. We believe the Nikkei Stock Average Volatility Index (NKVI) is the most promising candidate to become a leading gauge for APAC. However, to date, methodological shortcomings […]

    Learn more
  • Market structure

    Three ways to keep Europe’s retail investors investing

    An unprecedented boom in retail investing is sweeping Europe, powered by the growth of zero-commission brokers. While a hugely promising trend, it’s important to keep smaller investors engaged by ensuring good outcomes. This means better execution, sufficient access to competitive, multilateral exchange-traded products and greater financial education.

    Learn more
  • Series
    Market structure

    The US equity options market is overdue for an update

    While equity markets are under the spotlight in the current US equity market structure debate, the reality is that practices common in the equity options market, such as permanent specialist appointments, complicated price improvement mechanisms and asymmetric fees, are an even more significant issue, particularly for retail traders who are forced to pay wider spreads than they would in a truly competitive market.

    Learn more
  • Series
    Market structure

    Equity options specialists: too much of a good thing?

    Specialists play a critical liquidity provisioning role in equity options markets. However, the advantages specialists receive for taking on this role are often disproportionate to the liquidity they provide. Lack of competition, special allocation rights for small orders and a murky appointment process are too high a price to pay for extra liquidity in already liquid symbols.

    Learn more